The receptor nomenclature supplement to this month’s TiPS (Trends in
Pharmacological Sciences, a British journal) makes no mention of
substance P, nor does my (just 2 years old) Goodman & Gilman’s.
Is there a different name for substance P or are both of these simply
not mentioning it?
Best Wishes
== Bob Yazz ==
—
Ever cautious, Motives pure; Safe and effective, Who could demur?
Lead, follow or get out of the way. Unless, of course, you’re the FDA.
In article <2o4h5q$1…@troy.la.locus.com>, y…@lccsd.sd.locus.com (Bob
Yazz) wrote:
> The receptor nomenclature supplement to this month’s TiPS (Trends in
> Pharmacological Sciences, a British journal) makes no mention of
> substance P, nor does my (just 2 years old) Goodman & Gilman’s.
> Is there a different name for substance P or are both of these simply
> not mentioning it?
I have never heard Substance P referred to by any other name. If your
really interested look for a book called The Biochemical Basis of
Neuropharmacology, 6th Ed. by Cooper, Bloom, and Roth. The publisher is
Oxford University Press. This book has a somewhat brief but adequate
discussion as well as a few references on Substance P.
Will
—
+————————————————————————+
| William T. Pepper, D.V.M. | Any views expressed |
| College of Veterinary Medicine | above are entirely my|
| Mississippi State University | own…I think! |
| ahc_lab_2.administrat…@cvmfaculty.msstate.edu| |
+————————————————————————+